CMMI研究院在11月，向行业所有的合作伙伴通报了提交资料的共同三个问题。发文标题是：CMMI Appraisal System (CAS) Three Commonly Flagged Issues
1. 第一个问题：
Resource Effort Estimates
The Method Definition Document (MDD) requires that Lead Appraisers (LAs) estimate the effort of the appraisal team as well as the appraisal participants and other members of the organizational unit (OU) during the Plan & Prepare for Appraisal and Conduct Appraisal phases.
工作量估算的问题
许多评估师在CAS上只填写了评估第二阶段（执行评估阶段）访谈工作量估算值，遗漏了计划和准备阶段的工作量和第二阶段中其他人员的工作量估算值，比如评估师、ATM、发起人、协调员的前期会谈、准备就绪评审，和开会等的工作量。
2. 第二个问题：
Project-Level Characterizations and Practice Area (PA) Mapping to the Randomly Generated Sample (RGS)
Project-level characterizations are a required piece of the appraisal data package as per the MDD; however, in many cases this information is not being submitted with appraisal records. While there is not a specific upload location for it in the system, the appraisal artifacts must include this information in some format. Project-level characterizations are vital to ensure that data has been collected and evaluated for the projects and support functions as prescribed by the RGS.
与选样结果一致的项目层面实践域描述的问题
许多评估师，只提交了最终的评级结果，没有各个RGS中项目对应的实践域的实践描述和评级细节。
3. 第三个问题：
Missing Account Information
ATMs and other participants with appraisal roles (i.e., OU coordinator, Registered Interpreter, Sponsor, etc.) should fill in their personal information in their CAS accounts. However, there have been many occurrences of CAS account owners not including their organizational affiliation. This has led to misidentification of individuals by LAs in CAS. It is the responsibility of the LA to verify that the correct individual is being added to appraisals. If unsure, the LA should direct the individual to update their CAS account with any missing information.
ATM信息不完整
即是ATM个人账号上，要把信息补充完整，比如各个领域工作经验信息，所属公司名称，地址等。
|
